Except that I'm in the middle of King Solomon's Mines, Jane Eyre, and Wives and Daughters just now, and a student just enthusiastically loaned me A Great and Terrible Beauty (which I shall squirrel away for Spring Break, when I shall deserve it most).
This term I am teaching three literature courses: ENG 250: Heroes and Monsters in Victorian Fiction (focusing on textual analysis); ENG 289: Approaches to Literary Study (the gateway to the English major course); and ENG 302: Marriage/Divorce in Victorian Literature. Such disparate topics yield interesting textual coincidences. For instance, in the first two weeks of the semester, I read Beowulf--and then The Tempest--along with Dracula and Wuthering Heights. This provoked comparisons of Grendel and Heathcliff, Grendel and Caliban, Dracula and Heathcliff, and so on. The coincidences make my head explode, and then my brains leak all over my classrooms. Today I found myself saying to my ENG 289 class, "Jane got calibanned by Aunt Reed."
 |
| Illustration by Walter Crane, c. 1893 |
2 comments:
I'm finding these sort of disparate classes yielding strange connections, too! Last semester I was teaching the 18C/19C survey course and an upper-div on modernism, and nearly every day I was rambling on to one class about what we'd done in the other that was such an "amazing coincidence!" Ha. And just yesterday I was able to actually use the Core curriculum I have to teach (i.e. Don Quixote) in my 18C novel class in a legitimate, discussion-enhancing way. Who knew being a one-woman show would actually pay off??
Holy crap, what DON'T you teach? Let's hope our beloved Liberal Arts students are having brain explosions of their own...
Post a Comment